Open Couples
|
||
| En Castellano | ||
|
||
| |
|
|
Indeed, many gay couples openly break the most hallowed of these conventions by espousing and living in "open relationships," in which either or both partners are free to explore and enjoy outside sexual encounters. This disregard of convention can be looked upon almost as a source of pride and liberation.
Men in our society, regardless of sexual orientation, have been raised to feel more reticent than women of revealing a need for intimacy and tenderness. This fear of appearing emotionally vulnerable is exacerbated in gay men by widespread social attitudes that, in their formative years, have labeled them "effeminate" or "sissies." Many gay men have experienced shaming experiences during the early course of their gay identity development, most often from other males--either father figures or peers. When gay men finally acknowledge their desire for a partner, the joy in the experience is often tempered by a fear of repetition of earlier traumatic rejections. |
|
|
An open relationship can be a way for a gay man to defend against exposing his need for closeness and nurturance from his partner, and to protect himself from possible rejection. Nonetheless, I'm convinced that all successful couples--gay and straight--must learn to balance their need for closeness and distance, intimacy and freedom. And for a couple to survive the developmental milestones of their relationships they must have an ability to accept and express vulnerability, commitment and mutual trust. This does not mean that I believe my role is to express a dogmatic stance categorically opposed to open relationships. I consider it part of my task as a therapist to help a couple explore what needs, sexual or otherwise, are not being met in the relationship, and to determine whether the interest in an open relationship is a response to those unfulfilled needs. I take a nonjudgmental stance about the kind of relationship they construct. If neither is endangering himself or others, I do not define my role as cop but as "provocateur." Rather than focus on the issue of sexual exclusivity, my goal is to reflect the dynamics I observe and introduce novelty into the couple's ways of relating. For gay men, given our history of trauma, this often means introducing behavior that promotes emotional openness. Couples therapy is often gay men's first opportunity to have their relationship legitimized. It can be deeply moving to see a gay couple experience for the first time what it means to openly express needs for closeness and the desire both to nurture and be nurtured by another man. Therapy can help two men learn how to feel safe with each other, express for perhaps the first time desires to be close, and feel a profound sense of validation in the eyes of another Opion by Peter Panthy: (Traslation by google) Let's say that here is a psychologist opining on gay relationships, being heterosexual (Since everything is in third person) So me being Gay and without being a psychologist I can give my opinion, since I have been in communication with more gay than he will in his life. Saying that he alone can not lead a gay monogamous relationship because it is traumatized, I think it is to generalize, do not say that to some does not happen, but in discussions and talks I've had both with my friends everyday and my virtual friends in ACH Semanario yahoo group. The relationship between two gay men is very diverse and has more to do with education, religion, and you see the gay community in his country and the laws that have each.
Just as many others (including my friends) choose to be in a monogamous because they want to. And this has to do with "treatment" that each partner makes joining and being hypocritical or not, the couple fail when decisions are made uniteralmente. And fall in love with another person has to do with being monogamous or not. Here Michael Shernoff said: "This disregard for the convention (for the open relationships" can be seen almost as a source of pride and liberation. "Making a comparison with heterosexual couples, which I think is a little ... naive. The principles of marriage to heterosexual couples would be to form a conventional family (hopefully) with reproduction itself. For Gay couple's family is formed, with the families of each and friends. And in some cases where the law allows the adoption, but no one will be getting married because the biological clock runs out. The open pairs are increasingly popular? Or is that people are more honest, and is more consistent with their behavior and desires, and "if" has more confidence with the other as to raise it? I believe that freedom must travel a path that leads us to experience our feelings, and only in freedom of speech and trust each other, we will define what kind of partner we want to be, without much roll.
Others temes : |
|
|
![]() |
||||